🔥Compare 20+ Prop Firms in Seconds
Independent Prop Firm Comparison: Compare Fees, Rules and Payouts
Compare prop firms side by side by challenge fees, drawdown rules, payout conditions, profit splits, platforms and trader suitability. Use filters for trading style, location, evaluation type and account features before choosing a funded account.
Independent comparison of 20+ prop firms
600+ traders subscribed to Prop Firms Compare
Last reviewed: July 2026. Key firm data is reviewed on a rolling basis.
This page is for traders comparing funded account providers before buying a challenge, not for traders looking for broker recommendations or trade signals.
Affiliate disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. We may receive a commission if you purchase through one of these links, at no additional cost to you. Our rankings are based on suitability and published rules rather than the commission offered by a firm.
Find prop firms for your trading style
Find prop firms that match your trading style, location and account requirements.
Top Ranked Prop Firms
View All Rankings
Compare prop firms side by side
The comparison tool helps you compare prop firms by challenge type, lowest fee, profit split, daily loss, maximum drawdown, payout conditions, trading restrictions, platforms and account suitability.
Use our interactive comparison tool to filter firms by account size, pricing, platforms (DXtrade, cTrader, Match‑Trader), drawdown type, and regional availability. Matching your strategy, whether swing trading or high‑frequency scalping, to the right rules dramatically increases your chances of long‑term success.
What should you compare between prop firms?
The most important parts of a prop firm comparison are the rules that affect whether you can pass, keep the account and receive a payout. Start with drawdown, challenge targets, trading restrictions, fees and payout conditions before comparing account size or headline profit split.
This comprehensive prop firm comparison breaks down the core mechanics of modern prop trading, helping you select the platform that best aligns with your trading style and risk management approach.
How to compare prop trading firms
When comparing prop firms, focusing only on maximum account size is a common mistake. To identify the best prop firms, you must evaluate the underlying rules that determine whether an account is sustainable or structured to trigger unnecessary breaches.
Evaluation models: one-step vs two-step challenges
Prop trading companies typically offer three types of funding programmes:
- Two‑Step Evaluations: The industry standard. Traders must reach a profit target (usually 8–10%) in Phase 1, followed by a smaller target (around 5%) in Phase 2, while respecting strict daily and maximum loss limits. These programmes often feature lower fees and higher leverage.
- One‑Step Evaluations: A single evaluation phase with a profit target of roughly 10%. To offset the faster path to funding, firms often use a trailing drawdown instead of a static one, making risk management more challenging.
- Instant Funding: Traders can skip a traditional evaluation and access a funded-stage account more quickly, but these programmes usually have higher upfront costs, tighter drawdown rules or stricter payout conditions.
Drawdown rules: Static vs Trailing
Drawdown calculation is one of the most important factors in your survival as a funded trader. Understanding drawdown rules is critical:
- Static Drawdown: Based on your initial balance. A $100,000 account with a 10% max drawdown breaches at $90,000, regardless of profit made. This allows you to lock in gains and build a buffer.
- Trailing Drawdown: Follows your highest equity peak. If your account grows to $105,000, a 10% trailing drawdown moves the breach level to $95,000. This rule is essential to understand when filtering firms using a comparison tool.
Maximising payouts: Profit splits and scaling plans
The goal of passing a challenge is consistent payouts. Most modern prop firms offer competitive profit splits starting at 80/20, with some increasing to 90% or even 100% through add‑ons or scaling milestones.
Pay close attention to:
- Payout Frequency: Bi‑weekly or monthly? Are minimum active trading days required?
- Consistency Rules: Some firms limit how much of your total profit can come from a single day (e.g., 30–40%) to discourage oversized “lottery ticket” trades.
Why traders trust Prop Firms Compare
Independent rankings
Editorial rankings based on published rules and our scoring methodology
20+ Firms compared
20+ prop firms compared across key trading criteria
Regularly updated data
Key ranking and comparison data is reviewed on a rolling basis
Real trader reviews
Reviews include published rules, editorial analysis and trader feedback
Compare prop firms by priority
| What matters most? | What to compare | Recommended page |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest upfront cost | Evaluation, activation and reset fees | Cheap prop firms |
| No evaluation | Instant-account fee and drawdown | Instant funding |
| Swing trading | Overnight, weekend and news rules | Swing traders |
| New trader | Rule simplicity and static drawdown | Beginners |
| UK access | Eligibility, GBP payments and platforms | UK traders |
| US access | Market type, platform and current eligibility | US traders |
Finding cheap prop firms without sacrificing quality
Many newer traders prioritise reducing upfront financial risk. However, choosing the cheapest prop firm should not mean compromising on execution quality, payout reliability or slippage.
When comparing budget‑friendly firms, assess the cost‑per‑capital ratio. A challenge may appear inexpensive, but restrictive rules or tight time limits can drastically reduce your chances of passing.
Look for firms offering:
- No Time Limits: Unlimited days remove pressure and prevent forced trades during low‑probability market conditions.
- Refundable Fees: Top firms refund the challenge fee with your first payout, making the evaluation effectively free over time.
Regional spotlight: Prop firms in the UK and US
Geographic location profoundly impacts how you interact with a prop trading firm. Regulatory landscapes differ globally, steering how these companies structure their business models.
Prop firms in the UK
If you’re searching for the best prop firm in the United Kingdom, prioritise operational compliance and local payment processing. The UK prop firm ecosystem is mature, with many firms offering:
- GBP‑denominated accounts
- Local banking support
- Customer service aligned with UK time zones
- Strong transparency and multi‑asset availability
- Clear tax documentation for independent contractors
Prop firms in the US
US prop firms operate under a unique regulatory framework, especially regarding retail forex and CFDs. Many have shifted toward futures‑based models (e.g., Tradovate, NinjaTrader) or use decentralised execution networks to remain compliant while serving global traders.
Popular prop firm comparisons
| Comparison | Best for | Read |
|---|---|---|
| FTMO vs FundedNext | Traders comparing reputation, rules, pricing and payout speed | FTMO vs FundedNext |
| FTMO vs Alpha Capital | Traders comparing FTMO with a UK-based alternative | FTMO vs Alpha Capital |
| FTMO vs The5ers | Traders comparing a traditional challenge model with growth-style funding | FTMO vs The5ers |
How Prop Firms Compare scores firms
Our scoring system evaluates each firm objectively, giving more weight to the factors that genuinely influence long‑term trader success. The database is updated weekly to ensure accuracy.
Editorial rankings based on our published methodology
We compare prop firms using published account rules, challenge conditions, pricing, payout information, platform availability, trader feedback and our scoring methodology.
Scoring criteria
Each firm is analysed across these categories, highlighting hidden rules, scaling programmes, and allocation limits to help you make informed decisions. Full methodology ->
Free prop firm challenge calculator
Regular updates
We review key ranking and comparison data on a rolling basis. Where possible, rules, pricing and payout information are checked against official firm sources. Traders should still confirm the latest terms on the firm’s website before buying a challenge.
Research individual prop firm reviews
FundedNext
Trustpilot: 4.5
98Overall ScoreA detailed review of FundedNext’s evaluation models, drawdown rules, payout conditions, platforms and suitability for different trading strategies.
The5ers
Trustpilot: 4.8
96Overall ScoreA detailed review of The5ers’ funding programmes, drawdown rules, account growth model, payout conditions and fit for lower-frequency traders.
FTMO
Trustpilot: 4.8
95Overall ScoreA detailed review of FTMO’s evaluation structure, daily and maximum loss rules, payout process, platform access and scaling conditions.
Alpha Capital
Trustpilot: 4.7
94Overall ScoreA detailed review of Alpha Capital’s evaluation structures, trading rules, platform options, account fees and payout conditions.
E8 Markets
Trustpilot: 4.4
92Overall ScoreA detailed review of E8 Markets’ programme range, drawdown calculations, trading restrictions, platform options and scaling conditions.
Test your risk before buying a challenge
Enter your win rate, risk per trade and reward-to-risk ratio to estimate how your strategy could perform against a prop firm target and drawdown limit.
Calculate Your Challenge-Passing Probability
Find out what is your probability of passing an evaluation challenge with our Monte Carlo Probability Calculator.
Latest prop firm discounts
Need help choosing the right Prop Firm?
Prop firm comparison FAQs
A prop firm, or proprietary trading firm, gives traders access to a funded trading account after they meet the firm’s requirements. Traders usually pay for an evaluation and must reach a profit target without breaching drawdown or risk limits. Successful traders receive a share of the profits, while the prop firm provides the account, trading platform and risk-management framework.
Reputable prop firms are generally safe, but traders should research each firm carefully. Key things to check include: transparency of rules, payout reputation, company history, fees, and online reviews. Avoid firms with unclear policies, unrealistic promises, or poor customer feedback.
Most prop trading firms require traders to pass an evaluation or challenge. This usually involves meeting profit targets while following strict risk‑management rules. Once a trader passes, they may receive access to a funded-stage account. Depending on the firm, this may be simulated, live or managed through another risk model. Traders usually receive a share of eligible profits if they follow the firm’s rules.
Profit splits determine how trading profits are shared between the trader and the firm. Many firms offer splits ranging from 80/20 up to 90/10 (trader/firm). Some firms increase profit splits as traders progress or maintain consistent performance.
The available markets depend on the prop firm and account type. Common options include forex, indices, commodities and cryptocurrencies. Futures-focused prop firms may offer exchange-traded futures, while some firms also provide access to stocks or synthetic instruments. Traders should also compare supported platforms, such as MT4, MT5, cTrader or proprietary trading terminals.
We assess each proprietary trading firm across seven weighted categories. Each category contributes a set number of points towards a maximum score of 100. Our scoring process considers the firm’s trading conditions, drawdown rules, challenge structure, costs, payouts, platform options, reputation and overall suitability for different types of traders.
Start by comparing the prop firm’s drawdown and risk-management rules. Maximum daily loss, overall drawdown, trailing drawdown and consistency rules can directly affect how you trade and how easily you could lose the account. After reviewing these limits, compare challenge fees, profit targets, payout conditions, trading restrictions and platform availability.
Many prop firms are legitimate businesses, but the industry is not regulated in the same way as traditional brokers or financial institutions. Prop firms should therefore be assessed through their company history, transparency, trading rules, payout record and reputation. Traders should compare several firms carefully and read the full terms before paying for an evaluation.
Prop Firms Compare focuses on a carefully selected group of established prop trading firms rather than listing every available provider. We prioritise firms with a visible operating history, clear trading conditions and an established presence in the industry. Our comparisons consider different trading styles and risk requirements, and our rankings are not determined by paid placements or promotional incentives from prop firms.